The End of Apartheid in
South Africa
Red and Black Publishers, St Petersburg, Florida
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Mandela, Nelson, 1918-
[Selections. 2010]
Selected speeches and writings of Nelson Mandela : the end of apartheid
in South Africa.
p. cm.
ISBN 978-1-934941-78-2
1. South Africa--Politics and
government--1948-1994--Sources. 2. South Africa--Politics and
government--1994---Sources. 3. Apartheid--South
Africa--History--Sources. 4. Anti-apartheid movements--South
Africa--History--20th century--Sources. 5. African National
Congress--History--20th century--Sources. 6. South Africa--Race
relations--Sources. 7. Blacks--South Africa--Politics and
government--Sources. I. Title.
DT1974.M344 2010
352.23'80968--dc22
2010000667
Red
and Black Publishers, PO Box 7542, St Petersburg, Florida, 33734
Contact us at: info@RedandBlackPublishers.com
Printed and manufactured in the United States of America
Contents
Editor’s Preface
5
“No Easy Walk to
Freedom”
13
General Strike
27
Black Man In A
White Court
45
“I Am Prepared
to Die” 87
Unite! Mobilise!
Fight On!
117
The Mandela
Document
123
Mandela’s
Address After His Release From Prison
137
Message To USA Big
Business
143
Statement At UN
Special Committee Against Apartheid
151
Speech At The Rally To
Relaunch The South African Communist Party
159
Speech To The
Organisation Of African Unity
165
Statement At The
World Economic Conference
169
Ceremony for the
Award of the Felix Houphouet-Boigny Peace Prize 179
Democracy—The
Only Solution
183
Statement At The
United Nations Security Council
187
Press Statement,
ANC/NP Summit Meeting
199
Speech To The
National Conference On AIDS
203
Speech On
Acceptance Of The Prince Of Asturias Prize Of International Co-Operation
209
Negotiations, the
ANC Vision of a New South African and the Indian Community
213
Speech To Members
Of The British Parliament
221
Statement At The
United Nations
231
Statement On The
Announcement Of The Award Of The Nobel Peace Prize 241
Acceptance Speech
At The Nobel Peace Prize Award
Ceremony
243
Speech Announcing
The ANC Election Victory
249
Address On The
Occasion Of Inauguration As State
President
253
State Of The
Nation
257
Statement at the
OAU
273
Address On The Anniversary Of The Soweto Uprising
281
Editor’s
Preface
Nelson Rolihlala Mandela was born in July 1918, in
the Transkei province of South Africa. His father, Henry Mandela, was a
chieftain of the Tembu tribe, and the young Nelson was being groomed for a
high position in the tribe, but instead left to study law.
In
1948, the New Nationalist Party, made up mostly of Afrikaners, or descendents
of Dutch settlers, won the elections, and imposed a rigid social system of
racism and white supremacy onto the country that was known as apartheid
(“separateness”). The Nationalists would hold power for almost the next
half century.
Under
the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act and the Immorality Amendment, mixed
marriages and interracial sex were outlawed; under the Abolition of Passes
Act, Africans were required to carry an identifying passbook at all times, and
could not move from one area to another without permission; under the
Population Registration Act, the entire population was registered by racial
group (into “White”, “Bantu”, “Indian” or “Coloured”); under
the Group Areas Act, land areas were assigned by race, and people who lived in
the “wrong” areas were forcibly removed and “resettled”; under the
Reservation of Separate Amenities Act, public amenities such as beaches,
swimming pools and restaurants were segregated; under the Separate
Representation of Voters Act, the right to vote was restricted solely to
Whites; and under the Bantu Education Act, a separate education system was set
up for Blacks (but controlled entirely by Whites) to give “appropriate”
teaching to the different racial groups.
To
enable control of the majority of the population by the white minority, South
Africa was turned into a police state. The
Suppression of Communism Act allowed the government to outlaw any
“subversive” organization, while both individuals and organizations were
subject to ”banning orders” which prohibited them from writing, speaking
publicly, or attending public meetings. The Terrorism Act established the
Bureau of State Security (BOSS), which had authority to jail “terrorists”
(anyone who criticized apartheid) indefinitely without trial.
The
ultimate stage of the apartheid policy was the formation of “Bantu
Homelands”, which were small areas set aside as “independent states” for
the African population. In theory, each of the “homelands” was to be a
place where each African tribe could have independence and self-rule, and all
Africans were involuntarily stripped of South African citizenship and assigned
to a “homeland”. In reality, however, the homelands were simply huge
prison camps, which served to remove the Africans from White presence until
they were needed as pools of cheap labor. None of the world’s nations ever
recognized the legality of the homeland “governments”.
Appalled
by the injustice of the apartheid system, Mandela and his partner, Oliver
Tambo, set up the first Black law firm in Johannesburg, specializing in
defending poverty-stricken clients who were accused of violating the apartheid
laws. Both Mandela and Tambo were members of the African National Congress, an
organization dedicated to democracy and an end to institutionalized racism. By
1952, the ANC was South Africa’s leading anti-apartheid organization, and
Mandela was directing its Youth League. One of the most vehement opponents of
apartheid was the outlawed South African Communist Party, which formed an
alliance with the ANC that lasted through the entire era. Mandela became
friends with many members of the Communist Party’s underground leadership.
Mandela
became impressed by the work of Mohandas Gandhi, an immigrant from India who
was resisting apartheid in the Indian and Coloured communities by organizing
mass actions of nonviolent non-cooperation. In 1952, Mandela helped organize
the Campaign for the Defiance of Unjust Laws, a civil disobedience campaign to
resist the pass laws. He was arrested and convicted, then given a suspended
sentence. Mandela was also told that his law practice was illegal, since it
was not located in the proper racial neighborhood, and he was ordered to leave
Johannesburg. Instead, he defied
the order and remained in the city illegally. In 1955, Mandela helped to write
the Freedom Charter, which summarized the ANC’s program of a non-racial
democracy and became the central document of the anti-apartheid movement.
In
March 1956, Mandela was served with a banning order, prohibiting him from
writing, speaking or traveling. In December, he and 100 other anti-apartheid
activists were arrested and charged with treason—the trial was designed to
simply harass the activists, and Mandela was finally acquitted of the charges
in 1961.
In
1960, another anti-apartheid group, the Pan-Africanist Congress (PAC), called
a peaceful mass protest in Sharpeville against the pass laws. Police fired on
the unarmed demonstrators, killing 70 people. Shortly later, the apartheid
government, which had been an independent nation within the British
commonwealth (like Canada or Australia), left the commonwealth and pronounced
a Republic of South Africa. The ANC replied by organizing a stay-at-home
“general strike”, which was immediately the focus of intense police and
military repression. Shortly after, the ANC was banned by the South African
government.
Forced
into hiding, the ANC leadership decided that peaceful nonviolent protest was
useless against a regime that was willing to machine-gun unarmed women and
children, and the ANC decided to organize an underground military wing to
carry out armed guerrilla actions against the regime. Mandela was chosen to
carry out the work. The new organization was called Umkhonto we Sizwe
(“Spear of the Nation”). Mandela, its commander in chief, knew nothing
whatever about military matters, and, when the West refused to help him,
turned instead to the South African Communist Party and its contacts in the
Soviet Bloc. In 1962, Mandela left the country illegally and traveled to
through Africa to Ethiopia, making arrangements for Soviet-supplied weapons
and training for his guerrilla fighters.
Upon
his return to South Africa, Mandela was arrested and charged with illegally
leaving the country and of organizing the stay-at-home strike. He was
sentenced to five years of hard labor. While in prison, in 1963, Mandela and
dozens of other anti-apartheid activists were charged with treason in the
“Rivonia Trial”, named after the Johannesburg suburb where most of them
were arrested. Mandela’s statement to the court, a passionate condemnation
of apartheid, became famous worldwide. Although the apartheid government had
sought the death penalty, international pressure forced them to impose a life
sentence instead. Mandela and the others were sent to the maximum security
prison on Robben Island. He stayed there for the next 27 years.
During
the time Mandela was in prison, the anti-apartheid movement grew in stature
and influence, and soon reached an international stage. South Africa became an
outlaw pariah state, shunned by most of the international community. In 1962,
the United Nations passed Resolution 1761, declaring apartheid to be criminal.
In 1963, the UN formed a Special Committee Against Apartheid. The
International Olympics Committee voted to exclude South Africa from the Games.
In 1974, the General Assembly passed a resolution to expel South Africa from
the UN, but the action was vetoed by France, England and the United States. In
1977, after police massacred hundreds of unarmed student protesters in Soweto,
the UN placed an arms embargo on South Africa.
Under
a policy called “constructive engagement”, the Reagan and Thatcher
Administrations continued to prop up the Pretoria regime. American and British
corporations were supported in their dealings with South Africa, under the
theory that they could then presumably help to “influence” South African
policy away from apartheid. The South African government was particularly
dependent upon American-made computer technology, without which the
bureaucratic task of administrating the maze of apartheid laws and
classifications would have been impossible. Both Thatcher and Reagan
classified the ANC as “communist” and a “terrorist organization”, and
ANC members were banned from entering the US without special permission.
In
the United States, opponents of the apartheid regime organized a nation-wide
campaign for “divestment”, calling on companies and governments to cut off
all economic ties to South Africa. Although American corporations (and the
Reagan Administration) resisted the divestment movement, thousands of local
and state governments in the US passed laws forbidding economic cooperation
with South Africa. There were also increasing international pressures on South
Africa to release Mandela and other imprisoned activists.
By
the 1980’s, the growing effectiveness of the ANC, and the increasingly
hostile international isolation of South Africa, led to a siege mentality
within the Pretoria government. President PW Botha surrounded himself with
generals and police officials and became obsessed with security. His actions
became increasingly more militaristic.
The
African nations that bordered South Africa became known as “the front-line
states”. Not only were they providing refuge for exiled anti-apartheid
activists and ANC guerrillas, but, as examples of Black-led states, they were
ideologically repugnant to the Afrikaner white supremacists. South African
military incursions into the frontline states steadily escalated, from small
cross-border raids on ANC bases, to military and political support for
Pretoria-friendly guerrilla groups like UNITA in Angola and FRELIMO in
Mozambique, to military operations against the ANC ally SWAPO (South West
Africa People’s Organization, which was fighting to end South Africa’s
illegal occupation of Namibia), to, finally, a full-scale invasion of Angola.
South Africa even secretly produced a small number of nuclear weapons, to be
used as a last resort against apartheid’s enemies.
By
the 1970’s, however, the inevitable end of apartheid was already in sight.
The enormous costs of administrating and defending the apartheid system were a
huge drain on the economy—a situation that was exacerbated by increasing
international sanctions (in 1985, Botha defiantly announced that he would
never allow the white minority in South Africa to commit “suicide” through
black rule, and, faced with Botha’s intransigence, even the US and Britain
were finally forced to give in to pressure to place economic sanctions on
South Africa).
By
1983, the South African economy was a shambles, the political situation was
more unstable than ever, and the need to make reforms was unstoppable. Botha
introduced a new Constitution containing a Tricameral Parliament, in which
Indians and Coloureds would now have their own legislative bodies. These would
have authority to administrate (and pay for) its own “internal affairs”
such as education or health care. National matters would still be decided by
the white-dominated Cabinet. Africans were to have no representation at all in
the government; they were considered to be “citizens” of their
“Bantustan homelands”—their passbooks would be repealed, and they would
now be issued “passports” from their “homeland”. Henceforth, Africans
would only be treated as “foreign guest workers”.
Botha began making covert overtures to Mandela, hoping to use
him to gain credibility for the Bantustans. In 1984, Botha sent word that he
was willing release Mandela from prison, on the condition that he make a
public announcement accepting the legitimacy of the Transkei “homeland”
and agree to live there. Mandela refused. A year later, while Mandela was
recuperating from surgery in prison, Botha secretly sent another offer, saying
he would release Mandela if he would renounce armed struggle. Mandela again
refused, but he was transferred from Robben Island prison to the
lower-security Victor Verser prison farm.
In
1989, Botha suffered a stroke, and FW de Klerk replaced him as President of
South Africa. It was a turning point, as de Klerk realized that the entire
system of apartheid was breaking down and could not be saved. In February
1990, de Klerk issued an order un-banning the ANC, the South African Communist
Party, the Pan-Africanist Congress, and other anti-apartheid organizations.
Nine days later, Mandela was released from prison, after serving 27 years. He
was promptly elected President of the ANC.
The
collapse of apartheid began. De Klerk agreed to the release of all political
prisoners, began dismantling all the legal machinery of apartheid, and ordered
the formation of a Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) to draw
up a non-racial constitution. De Klerk, however, bowing to pressure from the
Afrikaner nationalists, insisted that a three-fourths vote be required for any
constitutional changes. Since this could not be done without the cooperation
of the Nationalist Party, this would in effect give the White minority virtual
veto power. Negotiations came to an impasse.
This
was followed by a wave of violence. Peaceful protestors in the Ciskei “Bantu
Homeland”, who were demanding the reintegration of Ciskei back into South
Africa, were fired upon by “homeland” police. At the same time, violent
confrontations were taking place between ANC supporters and members of the
Zulu-based Inkatha Freedom Party, which wanted to set up an independent Zulu
nation in the KwaZulu “homeland”. There was also violence from whites who
feared black rule; South African Communist Party leader Chris Hani was
assassinated in April 1993 by a white nationalist.
When
negotiations restarted, de Klerk finally gave in and agreed to elections for a
new democratic government on the basis of “one person, one vote”.
In
April 27, 1994 (“Freedom Day”), South Africa’s first free election was
won by the African National Congress, with 62% of the vote. Nelson Mandela was
sworn in as President.
For
their joint work in ending apartheid, both Mandela and FW de Klerk shared the
1993 Nobel Peace Prize. Mandela is now viewed worldwide as a symbol of human
freedom, and has received numerous other awards and honors, including the
Prince of Asturias Prize of International Co-Operation, the Felix
Houphouet-Boigny Peace Prize, the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought by the
European Parliament, the Order of Merit from Queen Elizabeth, the Medal of
Freedom from President George W Bush, the OAU’s Africa Peace Award, the
Gandhi Peace Prize from India, the Ataturk Prize from Turkey (which he refused
to accept because of Turkey’s human rights violations), and the very last
Lenin Peace Prize to be awarded by the Soviet Union before its collapse.
“No
Easy Walk to Freedom”
September 21, 1953
Since 1912 and year after year thereafter, in their homes and local areas, in provincial and national gatherings, on trains and buses, in the factories and on the farms, in cities, villages, shanty towns, schools and prisons, the African people have discussed the shameful misdeeds of those who rule the country. Year after year, they have raised their voices in condemnation of the grinding poverty of the people, the low wages, the acute shortage of land, the inhuman exploitation and the whole policy of white domination. But instead of more freedom, repression began to grow in volume and intensity and it seemed that all their sacrifices would end up in smoke and dust. Today the entire country knows that their labours were not in vain, for a new spirit and new ideas have gripped our people. Today the people speak the language of action: there is a mighty awakening among the men and women of our country and the year 1952 stands out as the year of this upsurge of national consciousness.
In
June, 1952, the African National Congress and the South African Indian Congress,
bearing in mind their responsibility as the representatives of the downtrodden
and oppressed people of South Africa, took the plunge and launched the Campaign
for the Defiance of the Unjust Laws. Starting off in Port Elizabeth in the early
hours of June 26 and with only thirty-three defiers in action and then in
Johannesburg in the afternoon of the same day with one hundred and six defiers,
it spread throughout the country like wild fire. Factory and office workers,
doctors, lawyers, teachers, students and the clergy; Africans, Coloureds,
Indians and Europeans, old and young, all rallied to the national call and
defied the pass laws and the curfew and the railway apartheid regulations. At
the end of the year, more than 8,000 people of all races had defied. The
Campaign called for immediate and heavy sacrifices. Workers lost their jobs,
chiefs and teachers were expelled from the service, doctors, lawyers and
businessmen gave up their practices and businesses and elected to go to jail.
Defiance was a step of great political significance. It released strong social
forces which affected thousands of our countrymen. It was an effective way of
getting the masses to function politically; a powerful method of voicing our
indignation against the reactionary policies of the Government. It was one of
the best ways of exerting pressure on the Government and extremely dangerous to
the stability and security of the State. It inspired and aroused our people from
a conquered and servile community of yes-men to a militant and uncompromising
band of comrades-in-arms. The entire country was transformed into battle zones
where the forces of liberation were locked up in immortal conflict against those
of reaction and evil. Our flag flew in every battlefield and thousands of our
countrymen rallied around it. We held the initiative and the forces of freedom
were advancing on all fronts. It was against this background and at the height
of this Campaign that we held our last annual provincial Conference in Pretoria
from the 10th to the 12th of October last year. In a way,
that Conference was a welcome reception for those who had returned from the
battlefields and a farewell to those who were still going to action. The spirit
of defiance and action dominated the entire conference.
Today
we meet under totally different conditions. By the end of July last year, the
Campaign had reached a stage where it had to be suppressed by the Government or
it would impose its own policies on the country.
The
government launched its reactionary offensive and struck at us. Between July
last year and August this year forty-seven leading members from both Congresses
in Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Kimberley were arrested, tried and convicted
for launching the Defiance Campaign and given suspended sentences ranging from
three months to two years, on condition that they did not again participate in
the defiance of the unjust laws. In November last year, a proclamation was
passed which prohibited meetings of more than ten Africans and made it an
offence for any person to call upon an African to defy. Contravention of this
proclamation carried a penalty of three years or of a fine of three hundred
pounds. In March this year the Government passed the so-called Public Safety Act
which empowered it to declare a state of emergency and to create conditions
which would permit of the most ruthless and pitiless methods of suppressing our
movement. Almost simultaneously, the Criminal Laws Amendment Act was passed
which provided heavy penalties for those convicted of Defiance offences. This
Act also made provision for the whipping of defiers including women. It was
under this Act that Mr. Arthur Matlala who was the local leader of the Central
Branch during the Defiance Campaign, was convicted and sentenced to twelve
months with hard labour plus eight strokes by the Magistrate of Villa Nora. The
Government also made extensive use of the Suppression of Communism Act. You will
remember that in May last year the Government ordered Moses Kotane, Yusuf Dadoo,
J. B. Marks, David Bopape and Johnson Ngwevela to resign from the Congresses and
many other organisations and were also prohibited from attending political
gatherings. In consequence of these bans, Moses Kotane, J. B. Marks, and David
Bopape did not attend our last provincial Conference. In December last year, the
Secretary General, Mr. W. M. Sisulu, and I were banned from attending gatherings
and confined to Johannesburg for six months. Early this year, the
President-General, Chief Luthuli, whilst in the midst of a national tour which
he was prosecuting with remarkable energy and devotion, was prohibited for a
period of twelve months from attending public gatherings and from visiting
Durban, Johannesburg, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and many other centres. A few
days before the President-General was banned, the President of the SAIC, Dr. G.
M. Naicker, had been served with a similar notice. Many other active workers
both from the African and Indian Congresses and from trade union organisations
were also banned.
The
Congresses realised that these measures created a new situation which did not
prevail when the Campaign was launched in June 1952. The tide of defiance was
bound to recede and we were forced to pause and to take stock of the new
situation. We had to analyse the dangers that faced us, formulate plans to
overcome them and evolve new plans of political struggle. A political movement
must keep in touch with reality and the prevailing conditions. Long speeches,
the shaking of fists, the banging of tables and strongly worded resolutions out
of touch with the objective conditions do not bring about mass action and can do
a great deal of harm to the organisation and the struggle we serve. The masses
had to be prepared and made ready for new forms of political struggle. We had to
recuperate our strength and muster our forces for another and more powerful
offensive against the enemy. To have gone ahead blindly as if nothing had
happened would have been suicidal and stupid. The conditions under which we meet
today are, therefore, vastly different. The Defiance Campaign together with its
thrills and adventures has receded. The old methods of bringing about mass
action through public mass meetings, press statements and leaflets calling upon
the people to go to action have become extremely dangerous and difficult to use
effectively. The authorities will not easily permit a meeting called under the
auspices of the ANC, few newspapers will publish statements openly criticising
the policies of the Government, and there is hardly a single printing press
which will agree to print leaflets calling upon workers to embark on industrial
action for fear of prosecution under the Suppression of Communism Act and
similar measures. These developments require the evolution of new forms of
political struggle which will make it reasonable for us to strive for action on
a higher level than the Defiance Campaign. The Government, alarmed at the
indomitable upsurge of national consciousness, is doing everything in its power
to crush our movement by removing the genuine representatives of the people from
the organisations. According to a statement made by Swart in Parliament on the
18th September, 1953, there are thirty-three trade union officials
and eighty-nine other people who have been served with notices in terms of the
Suppression of Communism Act. This does not include that formidable array of
freedom fighters who have been named and blacklisted under the Suppression of
Communism Act and those who have been banned under the Riotous Assemblies Act.
Meanwhile
the living conditions of the people, already extremely difficult, are steadily
worsening and becoming unbearable. The purchasing power of the masses is
progressively declining and the cost of living is rocketing. Bread is now dearer
than it was two months ago. The cost of milk, meat and vegetables is beyond the
pockets of the average family and many of our people cannot afford them. The
people are too poor to have enough food to feed their families and children.
They cannot afford sufficient clothing, housing and medical care. They are
denied the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability,
old age; and where these exist, they are of an extremely inferior and useless
nature. Because of lack of proper medical amenities our people are ravaged by
such dreaded diseases as tuberculosis, venereal disease, leprosy, pellagra; and
infantile mortality is very high. The recent state budget made provision for the
increase of the cost-of-living allowances for Europeans and not a word was said
about the poorest and most hard-hit section of the population—the African
people. The insane policies of the Government which have brought about an
explosive situation in the country have definitely scared away foreign capital
from South Africa and the financial crisis through which the country is now
passing is forcing many industrial and business concerns to close down, to
retrench their staffs, and unemployment is growing every day. The farm labourers
are in a particularly dire plight. You will perhaps recall the investigations
and exposures of the semi-slave conditions on the Bethal farms made in 1948 by
the Reverend Michael Scott and a Guardian correspondent; by the Drum
last year and the Advance in April this year. You will recall how human
beings, wearing only sacks with holes for their heads and arms, never given
enough food to eat, slept on cement floors on cold nights with only their sacks
to cover their shivering bodies. You will remember how they are woken up as
early as 4 a. m. and taken to work on the fields with the indunas sjambokking
those who tried to straighten their backs, who felt weak and dropped down
because of hunger and sheer exhaustion. You will also recall the story of human
beings toiling pathetically from the early hours of the morning till sunset, fed
only on mealie meal served on filthy sacks spread on the ground and eating with
their dirty hands. People falling ill and never once being given medical
attention. You will also recall the revolting story of a farmer who was
convicted for tying a labourer by his feet from a tree and had him flogged to
death, pouring boiling water into his mouth whenever he cried for water. These
things which have long vanished from many parts of the world still flourish in
SA today. None will deny that they constitute a serious challenge to Congress
and we are in duty bound to find an effective remedy for these obnoxious
practices.
The
Government has introduced in Parliament the Native Labour (Settlement of
Disputes) Bill and the Bantu Education Bill. Speaking on the Labour Bill, the
Minister of Labour, Ben Schoeman, openly stated that the aim of this wicked
measure is to bleed African trade unions to death. By forbidding strikes and
lockouts it deprives Africans of the one weapon the workers have to improve
their position. The aim of the measure is to destroy the present African trade
unions, which are controlled by the workers themselves and which fight for the
improvement of their working conditions, in return for a Central Native Labour
Board controlled by the Government and which will be used to frustrate the
legitimate aspirations of the African worker. The Minister of Native Affairs,
Verwoerd, has also been brutally clear in explaining the objects of the Bantu
Education Bill. According to him the aim of this law is to teach our children
that Africans are inferior to Europeans. African education would be taken out of
the hands of people who taught equality between black and white. When this Bill
becomes law, it will not be the parents but the Department of Native Affairs
which will decide whether an African child should receive higher or other
education. It might well be that the children of those who criticise the
Government and who fight its policies will almost certainly be taught how to
drill rocks in the mines and how to plough potatoes on the farms of Bethal. High
education might well be the privilege of those children whose families have a
tradition of collaboration with the ruling circles.
The
attitude of the Congress on these bills is very clear and unequivocal. Congress
totally rejects both bills without reservation. The last provincial Conference
strongly condemned the then proposed Labour Bill as a measure designed to rob
the African workers of the universal right of free trade unionism and to
undermine and destroy the existing African trade unions. Conference further
called upon the African workers to boycott and defy the application of this
sinister scheme which was calculated to further the exploitation of the African
worker. To accept a measure of this nature even in a qualified manner would be a
betrayal of the toiling masses. At a time when every genuine Congressite should
fight unreservedly for the recognition of African trade unions and the
realisation of the principle that everyone has the right to form and to join
trade unions for the protection of his interests, we declare our firm belief in
the principles enunciated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that
everyone has the right to education; that education shall be directed to the
full development of human personality and to the strengthening of respect for
human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance
and friendship among the nations, racial or religious groups and shall further
the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. That parents
have the right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their
children.
The
cumulative effect of all these measures is to prop up and perpetuate the
artificial and decaying policy of the supremacy of the white men. The attitude
of the government to us is that: “Let’s beat them down with guns and batons
and trample them under our feet. We must be ready to drown the whole country in
blood if only there is the slightest chance of preserving white supremacy.”
But
there is nothing inherently superior about the herrenvolk idea of the
supremacy of the whites. In China, India, Indonesia and Korea, American,
British, Dutch and French Imperialism, based on the concept of the supremacy of
Europeans over Asians, has been completely and perfectly exploded. In Malaya and
Indo-China British and French imperialisms are being shaken to their foundations
by powerful and revolutionary national liberation movements. In Africa, there
are approximately 190,000,000 Africans as against 4,000,000 Europeans. The
entire continent is seething with discontent and already there are powerful
revolutionary eruptions in the Gold Coast, Nigeria, Tunisia, Kenya, the
Rhodesias and South Africa. The oppressed people and the oppressors are at
loggerheads. The day of reckoning between the forces of freedom and those
of reaction is not very far off. I have not the slightest doubt that when that
day comes truth and justice will prevail.
The
intensification of repressions and the extensive use of the bans is designed to
immobilise every active worker and to check the national liberation movement.
But gone forever are the days when harsh and wicked laws provided the oppressors
with years of peace and quiet. The racial policies of the Government have
pricked the conscience of all men of good will and have aroused their deepest
indignation. The feelings of the oppressed people have never been more bitter.
If the ruling circles seek to maintain their position by such inhuman methods
then a clash between the forces of freedom and those of reaction is certain. The
grave plight of the people compels them to resist to the death the stinking
policies of the gangsters that rule our country.
But
in spite of all the difficulties outlined above, we have won important
victories. The general political level of the people has been considerably
raised and they are now more conscious of their strength. Action has become the
language of the day. The ties between the working people and the Congress have
been greatly strengthened. This is a development of the highest importance
because in a country such as ours a political organisation that does not receive
the support of the workers is in fact paralysed on the very ground on which it
has chosen to wage battle. Leaders of trade union organisations are at the same
time important officials of the provincial and local branches of the ANC. In the
past we talked of the African, Indian and Coloured struggles. Though certain
individuals raised the question of a united front of all the oppressed groups,
the various non-European organisations stood miles apart from one another and
the efforts of those for co-ordination and unity were like a voice crying in the
wilderness, and it seemed that the day would never dawn when the oppressed
people would stand and fight together shoulder to shoulder against a common
enemy. Today we talk of the struggle of the oppressed people which, though it is
waged through their respective autonomous organisations, is gravitating towards
one central command.
Our
immediate task is to consolidate these victories, to preserve our organisations
and to muster our forces for the resumption of the offensive. To achieve this
important task the National Executive of the ANC in consultation with the
National Action Committee of the ANC and the SAIC formulated a plan of action
popularly known as the “M” Plan and the highest importance is given to it by
the National Executives. Instructions were given to all provinces to implement
the “M” Plan without delay.
The
underlying principle of this plan is the understanding that it is no longer
possible to wage our struggle mainly on the old methods of public meetings and
printed circulars. The aim is:
to
consolidate the Congress machinery;
to
enable the transmission of important decisions taken on a national level to
every member of the organisation without calling public meetings, issuing press
statements and printing circulars;
to
build up in the local branches themselves local Congresses which will
effectively represent the strength and will of the people;
to
extend and strengthen the ties between Congress and the people and to
consolidate Congress leadership.
This
plan is being implemented in many branches not only in the Transvaal but also in
the other provinces and is producing excellent results. The Regional Conferences
held in Sophiatown, Germiston, Kliptown and Benoni on the 28th June,
23rd and 30th August and on the 6th September,
1953, which were attended by large crowds, are a striking demonstration of the
effectiveness of this plan, and the National Executives must be complimented for
it. I appeal to all members of the Congress to redouble their efforts and play
their part truly and well in its implementation. The hard, dirty and strenuous
task of recruiting members and strengthening our organisation through a house to
house campaign in every locality must be done by you all. From now on the
activity of Congressites must not be confined to speeches and resolutions. Their
activities must find expression in wide scale work among the masses, work which
will enable them to make the greatest possible contact with the working people.
You must protect and defend your trade unions. If you are not allowed to have
your meetings publicly, then you must hold them over your machines in the
factories, on the trains and buses as you travel home. You must have them in
your villages and shantytowns. You must make every home, every shack and every
mud structure where our people live, a branch of the trade union movement, and
never surrender.
You
must defend the right of African parents to decide the kind of education that
shall be given to their children. Teach the children that Africans are not one
iota inferior to Europeans. Establish your own community schools where the right
kind of education will be given to our children. If it becomes dangerous or
impossible to have these alternative schools, then again you must make every
home, every shack or rickety structure a centre of learning for our children.
Never surrender to the inhuman and barbaric theories of Verwoerd.
The
decision to defy the unjust laws enabled Congress to develop considerably wider
contacts between itself and the masses and the urge to join Congress grew day by
day. But due to the fact that the local branches did not exercise proper control
and supervision, the admission of new members was not carried out
satisfactorily. No careful examination was made of their past history and
political characteristics. As a result of this, there were many shady characters
ranging from political clowns, place-seekers, splitters, saboteurs,
agents-provocateurs, to informers and even policemen, who infiltrated into the
ranks of Congress. One need only refer to the Johannesburg trial of Dr. Moroka
and nineteen others, where a member of Congress who actually worked at the
National Headquarters, turned out to be a detective-sergeant on special duty.
Remember the case of Leballo of Brakpan who wormed himself into that Branch by
producing faked naming letters from the Liquidator, De Villiers Louw, who had
instructions to spy on us. There are many other similar instances that emerged
during the Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Kimberley trials. Whilst some of
these men were discovered there are many who have not been found out. In
Congress there are still many shady characters, political clowns, place-seekers,
saboteurs, provocateurs, informers and policemen who masquerade as progressives
but who are in fact the bitterest enemies of our organisation. Outside
appearances are highly deceptive and we cannot classify these men by looking at
their faces or by listening to their sweet tongues or their vehement speeches
demanding immediate action. The friends of the people are distinguishable by the
ready and disciplined manner in which they rally behind their organisation and
their readiness to sacrifice when the preservation of the organisation has
become a matter of life and death. Similarly, enemies and shady characters are
detected by the extent to which they consistently attempt to wreck the
organisation by creating fratricidal strife, disseminating confusion and
undermining and even opposing important plans of action to vitalise the
organisation.
In
this respect it is interesting to note that almost all the people who oppose the
“M” Plan are people who have consistently refused to respond when sacrifices
were called for, and whose political background leaves much to be desired. These
shady characters by means of flattery, bribes and corruption, win the support of
the weak-willed and politically backward individuals, detach them from Congress
and use them in their own interests. The presence of such elements in Congress
constitutes a serious threat to the struggle, for the capacity for political
action of an organisation which is ravaged by such disruptive and splitting
elements is considerably undermined. Here in South Africa, as in many parts of
the world, a revolution is maturing: it is the profound desire, the
determination and the urge of the overwhelming majority of the country to
destroy forever the shackles of oppression that condemn them to servitude and
slavery. To overthrow oppression has been sanctioned by humanity and is the
highest aspiration of every free man. If elements in our organisation seek to
impede the realisation of this lofty purpose then these people have placed
themselves outside the organisation and must be put out of action before they do
more harm. To do otherwise would be a crime and a serious neglect of duty. We
must rid ourselves of such elements and give our organisation the striking power
of a real militant mass organisation.
Kotane,
Marks, Bopape, Tloome and I have been banned from attending gatherings and we
cannot join and counsel with you on the serious problems that are facing our
country. We have been banned because we champion the freedom of the oppressed
people of our country and because we have consistently fought against the policy
of racial discrimination in favour of a policy which accords fundamental human
rights to all, irrespective of race, colour, sex or language. We are exiled from
our own people, for we have uncompromisingly resisted the efforts of imperialist
America and her satellites to drag the world into the rule of violence and
brutal force, into the rule of the napalm, hydrogen and the cobalt bombs, where
millions of people will be wiped out to satisfy the criminal and greedy
appetites of the imperial powers. We have been gagged because we have
emphatically and openly condemned the criminal attacks by the imperialists
against the people of Malaya, Vietnam, Indonesia, Tunisia and Tanganyika and
called upon our people to identify themselves unreservedly with the cause of
world peace and to fight against the war policies of America and her satellites.
We are being shadowed, hounded and trailed because we fearlessly voiced our
horror and indignation at the slaughter of the people of Korea and Kenya. The
massacre of the Kenya people by Britain has aroused world-wide indignation and
protest. Children are being burnt alive, women are raped, tortured, whipped and
boiling water poured on their breasts to force confessions from them that Jomo
Kenyatta had administered the Mau Mau oath to them. Men are being castrated and
shot dead. In the Kikuyu country there are some villages in which the population
has been completely wiped out. We are prisoners in our own country because we
dared to raise our voices against these horrible atrocities and because we
expressed our solidarity with the cause of the Kenya people.
You
can see that “there is no easy walk to freedom anywhere, and many of us will
have to pass through the valley of the shadow (of death) again and again before
we reach the mountain tops of our desires.”
“Dangers
and difficulties have not deterred us in the past, they will not frighten us
now. But we must be prepared for them like men in business who do not waste
energy in vain talk and idle action. The way of preparation (for action) lies in
our rooting out all impurity and indiscipline from our organisation and making
it the bright and shining instrument that will cleave its way to (Africa’s)
freedom.”